Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;6:19. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0096-4

Table 2.

The impact of the FHCI in public/NGO/missionary health facilities

Simple linear Linear interaction Quadratic interaction
Utilisation (LPM)
ITT effect (Age ≥ 5 years) −0.0310 −0.0197 0.0885
(0.060) (0.061) (0.098)
N 1633 1633 1633
AIC 2235.2 2236.5 2234.3a
Probability of reporting zero consultation and prescription expenditure (LPM)
ITT effect (Age ≥ 5 years) −0.134* −0.142** −0.0938
(0.071) (0.071) (0.116)
N 915 915 915
AIC 1180.8a 1182.3 1186.0
Probability of reporting zero consultation expenditure (LPM)
ITT effect (Age ≥ 5 years) −0.121* −0.126* −0.0359
(0.073) (0.072) (0.113)
N 915 915 915
AIC 1136.5a 1138.3 1141.2
Probability of reporting zero prescription expenditure (LPM)
ITT effect (Age ≥ 5 years) −0.0410 −0.0628 −0.0600
(0.058) (0.059) (0.095)
N 915 915 915
AIC 1005.8 1003.9a 1007.8
Total expenditure (two-part model showing marginal effects)
ITT effect (Age ≥ 5 years) −0.144 −0.0827 −0.623
(0.462) (0.436) (1.753)
N 915 915 915
AIC 686.0 685.94 685.93a

Control variables includes region dummies, head of households’ age and education

Standard errors in parentheses

LPM linear probability model

* p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05

aOptimal model specification