Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;9:25. doi: 10.1186/s12284-016-0098-1

Table 1.

Relative water content (RWC) measurements of rice cultivars

start 3 h 24 h 48 h
CV mean p mean p mean p mean p
Carnaroli 95.3 bcd 68.3 abcd 16.8 abc 14.3 a
Gigante Vercelli 94.4 abcd 66.9 abc 17.2 abc 12.0 a
Loto 91.8 a 64.6 ab 33.9 abcde 11.7 a
Maratelli 92.9 ab 63.4 a 13.7 ab 13.8 a
Vialone Nano 93.3 abc 62.8 a 11.9 a 9.2 a
Thaibonnet 96.7 d 84.0 efg 39.7 cdef 18.5 ab
Baldo 94.6 abcd 78.1 defg 35.7 bcdef 23.6 abc
Gladio 97.0 d 85.6 fg 28.1 abcd 31.5 abc
Koral 92.9 ab 77.9 defg 50.6 defg 27.0 abc
Salvo 96.2 cd 76.8 cdef 30.3 abcde 28.1 abc
SISR215 95.3 bcd 78.4 defg 37.1 cdef 30.4 abc
Volano 93.9 abcd 74.7 bcde 34.4 abcdef 26.7 abc
Arborio 95.7 bcd 79.8 efg 52.8 efg 37.6 bc
Venere 96.4 cd 87.9 g 62.9 gh 44.6 cd
Asia 96.1 cd 85.3 efg 57.0 fgh 63.5 de
Augusto 94.3 abcd 76.9 cdef 76.6 hi 82.4 ef
Eurosis 94.2 abcd 87.0 fg 89.7 i 86.4 f

Data were taken following 0, 3, 24 and 48 h of PEG treatment. Each percentage value is the mean of 5 plants. For each sampling time, data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance to compare the different varieties. Different letters in the same column show significant differences based on a Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.001)