Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2007 Sep 6;38(4):467–480. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001353

Table 1.

Summary of key studies assessing post-traumatic stress after human-made disasters

Prevalence
Study Sample type Sample size (n) T1a % T2 % T3 %
1992 Los Angeles County civil disturbances (29 April 1992)
Hanson et al. (1995)b Community n=1200 in LA County 6–8 months 4.1%
2001 Terrorist attacks, New York City and Washington, DC (11 September 2001)
Galea et al. (2002)b Community n=988 in Manhattan 5–8 weeks 7.5%
Schlenger et al. (2002)b Community n=2273 nationally 1–2 months 11.2% in NYC, 4.3% nationally
Nandi et al. (2005)b Community n=2001 in NYC 4 months 7.4%
Hoven et al. (2005)b Community n=8236 NYC students 6 months 10.6%
Galea et al. (2004)b Community n=2616 in NYC metropolitan area 6–9 months 5.2% (non-Hispanics), 14.3% (Dominicans), 13.2% (Puerto Ricans), 6.1% (other Hispanics)
Stuber et al. (2006)b Community n=2752 in NYC metropolitan area 6–9 months 6.5% (women), 5.4% (men)
Silver et al. (2002)c Community n=933 nationally at 2 months, 787 nationally at 6 months 2 months 17.0% 6 months 5.8%
Galea et al. (2003)d Community n=988 in Manhattan at 1 month, 2001 in NYC at 4 months, 1570 in NYC at 6 months 1 month 7.5% 4 months 1.7% 6 months 0.6%
Adams & Boscarino (2005)b Community n=2368 in NYC 1 year 4% (Whites), 5.5% (African Americans), 5.3% (Dominicans), 8.4% (Puerto Ricans), 5% (other Latinos)
Neria et al. (2006c)b Mixed n=930 NYC primary care patients 7–16 months 10.2%
Miguel-Tobal et al. (2006)b Community n=1589 in Madrid 1–3 months 2.3%
a

Timing of assessment(s) after the disaster.

b

Cross-sectional study design.

c

Prospective cohort study design.

d

Serial cross-sectional study design.