Table A1.
ORR | ITT (n = 137) |
MET Positive (n = 66) |
MET Negative (n = 62) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 68) |
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n = 69) |
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 31) |
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n =35) |
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 31) |
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n = 31) |
|||||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
No. of patients experiencing OR | 3 | 4.4* | 4 | 5.8* | 1 | 3.2 | 3 | 8.6 | 2 | 6.5 | 1 | 3.2 |
95% CI | 1.2 to 11.7 | 2.0 to 13.9 | 0.2 to 16.1 | 2.4 to 21.5 | 1.2 to 20.0 | 0.2 to 16.1 | ||||||
Difference in ORR | 1.4 | 5.3 | −3.2 | |||||||||
95% CI | −6.0 to 8.7 | −5.8 to 16.5 | −13.9 to 7.4 | |||||||||
Stratified P | .7101 | .3671 | .6726 |
Abbreviations: ITT, intent to treat; OR, objective response; ORR, objective response rate.
Six of these patients had known EGFR mutation–positive tumors.