Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 7;31(32):4105–4114. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.4189

Table A1.

ORRs in Randomly Assigned Patients

ORR ITT (n = 137)
MET Positive (n = 66)
MET Negative (n = 62)
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 68)
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n = 69)
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 31)
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n =35)
Placebo Plus Erlotinib (n = 31)
Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib (n = 31)
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
No. of patients experiencing OR 3 4.4* 4 5.8* 1 3.2 3 8.6 2 6.5 1 3.2
    95% CI 1.2 to 11.7 2.0 to 13.9 0.2 to 16.1 2.4 to 21.5 1.2 to 20.0 0.2 to 16.1
Difference in ORR 1.4 5.3 −3.2
    95% CI −6.0 to 8.7 −5.8 to 16.5 −13.9 to 7.4
    Stratified P .7101 .3671 .6726

Abbreviations: ITT, intent to treat; OR, objective response; ORR, objective response rate.

*

Six of these patients had known EGFR mutation–positive tumors.