TABLE 3.
Study Center Report of Most Effective Recruitment Methods in Its County and the Corresponding Percentage of the Population Who Consented
| Level of Awareness of NCS; SC Location | % of Total Population Who Consented (per 10 000) | Reported as Most Effective Recruitment Method by each SC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy Screener | Radio and Internet Ads | Schools | Healthcare Providers | “Face” of the Studya | Targeted Community Events | ||
| Low (25% to 49%) | |||||||
| Cook, IL | 0.16 | * | * | ||||
| Los Angeles, CA | 0.11 | * | |||||
| Douglas, CO | 5.60 | * | * | * | |||
| Moderate (50% to 74%) | |||||||
| Westmoreland, PA | 6.68 | * | * | ||||
| Ramsey, MN | 5.72 | * | |||||
| New Orleans, LA | 1.95 | * | |||||
| Montgomery, MD | 1.20 | * | * | ||||
| High (75% to 100%) | |||||||
| Cache, UT | 70.3 | * | |||||
| Baldwin, GA | 49.87 | * | * | * | |||
| Davidson, TN | 2.74 | * | |||||
Included active local celebrities, community advisory board, etc.