. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 24.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec 30;133(1):22–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.007

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of the relationship between discordant contraceptive use and physical and sexual IPV.^a

Variable	Total sample (n = 577)	Discordant contraceptive use in past 3 months (n = 37)^b	No discordant contraceptive use in past 3 months (n = 540)^b	Crude odds ratio (95% CI)	Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)^c
Physical IPV ever
Yes	207 (35.9)	18 (48.6)	189 (35.0)	1.75 (1.21–4.27)	1.81 (1.15–4.42)
No	370 (64.1)	19 (51.4)	351 (65.0)	Ref.	Ref.
Sexual IPV ever
Yes	183 (31.7)	17 (45.9)	158 (29.3)	1.96 (1.13–4.23)	1.95 (1.08–4.82)
No	394 (68.3)	20 (54.1)	382 (70.7)	Ref.	Ref.

Abbreviation: IPV, intimate partner violence; CI, confidence interval.

Values are given as number (percentage) unless indicated otherwise.

Discordant contraceptive use was defined as contraceptive use reported by wives but not husbands.

Adjusted for income generation by wives.