TABLE 3.
Electrophysiological Characteristics of Stimulus-Induced IPSPs Recorded in PC Neurons from Pilocarpine-Treated and NEC Slices in the Presence of Ionotropic Glutamatergic Receptor Antagonists
| Pilocarpine (n = 12) | NEC (n = 9) | |
|---|---|---|
| Early component | ||
| Reversal potential (mV) | −69.6 ± 1.0a | −74.9 ± 1.7 |
| Skewness | +0.4 ± 0.6 | −0.1 ± 0.7 |
| Kurtosis | −1.1 ± 1.2 | +0.4 ± 1.4 |
| Peak conductance (nS) | 13.2 ± 1.9 | 12.5 ± 3.1 |
| Late component | ||
| Reversal potential (mV) | −92.5 ± 5.7 | −97.9 ± 2.9 |
| Peak conductance (nS) | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 2.6 |
Data are provided as mean ± SEM.
a
Values are significantly different (P < 0.05) between pilocarpine-treated and NEC neurons, Mann–Whitney test.