Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;127(6):1145–1152. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001433

Table 2.

The Effects of Inclusion of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists–Recommended Counseling Elements and Other Elements of Provider Counseling on Maternal Decision for and Completion of Screening Tests for Fetal Aneuploidy

Counseling Element Conversations Including Counseling Element (n=190) Patients Choosing Screening After Counseling P* Patients Completing Screening Test After Counseling P
Counseling Elements Recommended by ACOG:
 Detection Rate 2 (1.1) 2/2 (100) 1.0 2/2 (100) 1.0
 False Positive Rate 3 (1.6) 2/3 (66.6) 0.56 2/3 (66.6) 0.82
 Advantages 104 (54.7) 84/104 (80.8) 0.19 77/104 (74.0) 0.62
 Disadvantages or Limitations 92 (48.7) 69/92 (75.0) 0.87 67/92 (72.8) 0.89
 Availability of Diagnostic Testing 73 (35.3) 53/73 (72.6) 0.27 52/73 (71.2) 0.96
Reviews the screening process 163 (85.8) 130/163 (79.8) 0.049 118/163 (72.4) 0.87
Gives a woman’s baseline (age-based) risk 55 (29.1) 39/55 (70.9) 0.07 42/55 (76.4) 0.42
Explains what is Down Syndrome 38 (20.0) 26/38 (68.4) 0.35 26/38 (68.4) 0.51
Explains that screening tests also screen for Trisomy 18 49 (25.8) 40/49 (81.6) 0.34 39/49 (79.6) 0.21
Explains that screening results are not diagnostic 97 (51.1) 73/97 (75.3) 0.86 72/97 (74.2) 0.58
Emphasizes that screening is optional 85 (44.7) 56/85 (65.9) 0.002 58/85 (68.2) 0.20
Discusses the option of pregnancy termination if results are abnormal 31 (16.3) 22/31 (71.0) 0.29 19/31 (61.3) 0.13
Discusses how screening results might be useful to a patient (reassurance, diagnostic testing, termination, etc.) 71 (37.4) 54/71 (76.1) 0.75 52/71 (73.2) 0.88
*

Patients who were undecided at the time of visit included with patients who declined screening in this analysis

Data are n (%) or n/n (%)

P values based on logistic regression with generalized estimating equations