Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;54(6):1586–1592. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00298-16

TABLE 4.

Comparison of Etest MICs and broth microdilution MICs of imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem for isolates of RGM and Nocardia

Species or complex and drug No. of isolates tested % error
Very major Major Minor
M. fortuitum
    Ertapenem 22 5 0 0
    Meropenem 22 0 0 86
    Imipenem 22 0 5 36
M. abscessus subsp. abscessus
    Ertapenem 44 0 0 0
    Meropenem 44 0 0 14
    Imipenem 44 0 7 48
M. chelonae
    Ertapenem 13 0 0 0
    Meropenem 12 0 0 0
    Imipenem 12 0 0 75
N. cyriacigeorgica
    Ertapenem 10 0 0 10
    Meropenem 10 0 0 20
    Imipenem 11 0 36 18
N. nova complex
    Ertapenem 32 0 3 43
    Meropenem 31 0 0 9
    Imipenem 32 0 0 0
N. brasiliensis
    Ertapenem 13 0 0 31
    Meropenem 13 0 8 31
    Imipenem 13 0 0 8
N. transvalensis complex
    Ertapenem 12 33 8 17
    Meropenem 12 8 8 42
    Imipenem 12 8 0 25