TABLE 1.
Comparison | ESwab PCR, % |
Lim broth PCR, % |
ESwab PCR vs Lim broth PCR, % |
McNemar test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | 95% CIb | Estimate | 95% CI | Difference | 95% CI | ||
Sensitivityc | |||||||
Same-day ESwab vs Lim broth PCR | 92.7 (101/109) | 86.2–96.2 | 99.1 (108/109) | 95.0–99.8 | −6.4 | −12.8 to −1.4 | 0.0156 |
24-h ESwab vs Lim broth PCR | 97.2 (106/109) | 92.2–99.1 | 99.1 (108/109) | 95.0–99.8 | −1.8 | −6.7 to 2.2 | 0.5000 |
Specificityd | |||||||
Same-day ESwab vs Lim broth PCR | 96.7 (291/301) | 94.0–98.2 | 95.0 (286/301) | 91.9–97.0 | 1.7 | −0.1 to 3.8 | 0.0625 |
24-h ESwab vs Lim broth PCR | 96.0 (289/301) | 93.2–97.7 | 95.0 (286/301) | 91.9–97.0 | 1.0 | −0.8 to 3.1 | 0.375 |
Lim broth culture is the reference method.
95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Values in parentheses represent the ratio of positive results to true positives.
Values in parentheses represent the ratio of negative results to true negatives.