. 2016 May 25;7:771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00771

Table 1.

Employee measures: means, standard deviations, reliability coefficients and scale intercorrelations.

	M_S^a	SD_S^a	M_n-d^b	SD_n-d^b	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
(1) Downsizing^c	1	–	0	–	(–)
(2) Identification w. employer (P1)	2.88	1.09	2.59	1.32	0.12	(0.71)
(3) Identification w. employer (P2)	2.40	1.16	3.63	1.29	-0.45^∗∗	0.54^∗∗	(0.70)
(4) Identification w. employer (P2 controlled for P1)	-0.72	0.75	0.69	1.03	-0.63^∗∗	0.00	0.84^∗∗	(–)
(5) Performance (P1)	70.79	35.62	64.67	37.46	0.09	0.28⁺	0.23	0.10	(–)
(6) Performance (P2)	44.67	53.73	77.50	36.74	-0.34^∗	0.17	0.46^∗∗	0.44^∗∗	0.46^∗∗	(–)
(7) Performance (P2 controlled for P1)	-18.31	47.59	18.31	28.41	-0.43^∗∗	0.05	0.39^∗∗	0.45^∗∗	0.00	0.89^∗∗	(–)
(8) Identification w. employees (P1)	3.75	1.04	3.66	1.35	0.04	0.31^∗	0.26⁺	0.11	0.26⁺	0.11	-0.01	(0.65)

Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients are shown in the diagonal; correlations and Alphas are based on the complete sample (i.e., survivors and non-downsized group); ^aS, Survivors (N = 24), ^bn-D, employees in non-downsized group (N = 24); ^cDummy variable (0 = no downsizing, 1 = downsizing); P1, before potential layoff; P2, after potential layoff; identification was measured with a seven- point scale, with 7 as highest and 1 as lowest value; performance is the number of correctly arranged sliders; ⁺p < 0.10; ^∗p < 0.05; ^∗∗p < 0.01.