Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;60(6):3489–3496. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02813-15

TABLE 1.

Drug resistance profile in promastigote L. major linesa

Drug Mean EC50 (μM) ± SD (RI)b
pUCNEO LABCG2 LABCG2rev 90D
SbIII 16.02 ± 2.63 118.84 ± 11.50 (7.4)* 11.53 ± 0.69 (0.7)
AsIII 0.99 ± 0.30 6.02 ± 1.50 (6.0)* 1.32 ± 0.02 (1.3)
Amphotericin B 2.27 ± 0.73 2.33 ± 0.45 (1.0)
Miltefosine 18.25 ± 0.22 17.64 ± 1.70 (0.9)
Pentamidine 0.66 ± 0.11 1.03 ± 0.11 (1.6)* 0.83 ± 0.03 (1.3)
Tafenoquine 12.87 ± 3.16 15.92 ± 7.50 (1.2)
Sitamaquine 21.88 ± 5.43 18.02 ± 0.82 (0.8)
Primaquine 5.43 ± 0.32 6.11 ± 0.05 (1.1)
Chloroquine 10.99 ± 0.53 9.37 ± 1.67 (0.8)
Daunomycin 0.56 ± 0.09 1.06 ± 0.16 (1.9)* 0.67 ± 0.06 (1.2)
Mefloquine 2.02 ± 0.19 3.04 ± 0.34 (1.5)
Quinine 23.62 ± 2.84 29.69 ± 0.26 (1.3)
Perifosine 20.99 ± 1.95 20.96 ± 1.27 (1.0)
Vinblastine 10.31 ± 2.16 13.25 ± 2.65 (1.3)
a

Promastigotes of Leishmania lines were grown for 72 h at 28°C in the presence of increasing concentrations of drugs. Cell viability was determined by using an MTT-based assay as described in Materials and Methods. Bold font represents significant resistance.

b

Resistance indexes (RI) were calculated by dividing the EC50 for the Leishmania line overexpressing LABCG2 and LABCG2rev 90D by that for the Leishmania control line (pUCNEO). Data are the means ± standard deviations of results from three independent experiments. Significant differences were determined by using the Student t test (*, P < 0.01). —, not determined.