Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 16;5(5):250–257. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12070

Table 2.

Summary of predicted and observed AUC and Cmax ratios using minimal and full PBPK models for naloxegol 25 mg with coadministration of various CYP3A/P‐gp modulatorsa

AUC Cmax
Modulator Dosing regimenb Observed Minimal PBPK model Full PBPK model Observed Minimal PBPK model Full PBPK model
Ketoconazole (CYP3A/P‐gp inhibitor) 400 mg q.d. for 5 days (day 4) 12.85 (11.3, 14.6) 13.14 (11.9, 14.5) 8.82 (7.17, 10.9) 9.58 (8.1, 11.3) 7.75 (6.9, 8.6) 4.19 (3.38, 5.21)
Diltiazem (CYP3A/P‐gp inhibitor) 240 mg q.d. for 5 days (day 4) 3.41 (3.16, 3.68) 2.80 (2.64, 2.98) 2.45 (2.10, 2.86) 2.85 (2.59, 3.14) 2.28 (2.18, 2.39) 1.70 (1.57, 1.83)
Rifampin (CYP3A/P‐gp inducer) 600 mg q.d. for 10 days (day 10) 0.11 (0.10, 0.13) 0.24 (0.22, 0.26) 0.37 (0.31, 0.43) 0.25 (0.19, 0.31) 0.27 (0.25, 0.30) 0.35 (0.32, 0.39)
Quinidine (CYP3A/P‐gp inhibitor) 600 mg single dose (day 1) 1.38 (1.31, 1.46) 1.13 (1.126, 1.14) 1.23 (1.21, 1.25) 2.44 (2.17, 2.75) 1.19 (1.18, 1.21) 1.87 (1.81, 1.93)

AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum concentration; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 3A4; PBPK, physiologically based pharmacokinetic; P‐gp, p‐glycoprotein; q.d., once daily.

a

Data are geometric means with 90% confidence intervals.

b

Dosing regimen of modulator, with day of naloxegol 25 mg coadministration in parentheses.