Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Feb 17;60(5):581–596. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew001

Table 2.

Results for noise dosimetry and area measurements overall, by mill, and by operation within mill

Dosimetry time-weighted
average (LEX,8h dBA)
Area average (LpAEQ,60s), dBA)


Facility/operation n Mean SD %>85 n Mean SD %>85
Overall** 209* 85.1§§ 5.5 57.1 100 83.6 5.8 44.0
Converting** 112 84.1§ 3.9 51.9 71 81.8 7.3 30.9
Papermaking 51 90.2§ 4.5 88.2 25 88.4 9.5 80.0
Pulping 20 84.2§ 4.6 43.4 4 86.0 3.5 50.0
Other 26 81.8§ 8.0 55.6 -- -- -- --
1** 75 83.6 5.9 46.7 52 83.5 9.9
Converting** 33 84.6§ 3.6 48.4 44 82.7 8.9 27.5
Papermaking 16 88.9§ 5.3 87.5 6 88.7 16.3 70.0
Pulping 11 82.3§ 4.6 27.2 2 86.5 5.7 37.1
Other 15 80.1§ 8.3 33.0 -- -- -- --
2 47 85.7 5.9 53.2 -- -- -- --
Converting 31 82.3§ 3.1 45.7 -- -- -- --
Papermaking 16 92.4§ 4.1 87.5 -- -- -- --
Pulping -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Other -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3 36 86.2 4.1 65.9 26 83.6 5.8 58.4
Converting** 16 85.3§ 4.7 68.0 15 80.0§ 4.1 57.4
Papermaking 13 88.5§ 3.5 69.2 9 89.1§ 4.0 96.4
Pulping 4 84.4§ 0.8 50.0 2 85.5§ 1.6 50.0
Other 3 84.4§ 2.8 66.7 -- -- -- --
4 51 85.9 4.9 65.6 22 83.8 6.8 31.8
Converting 32 84.9§ 4.1 61.9 12 80.7 1.7 0.0
Papermaking 6 91.7§ 1.3 100.0 10 87.5 8.8 70.0
Pulping 5 88.3§ 4.2 60.0 -- -- -- --
Other 4 84.9§ 3.5 50.0 -- -- -- --
*

37 subjects were monitored on two days, and 1 was monitored for 3 days

**

Difference between dosimeter and area dBA levels, t-test, p<0.05

§

Difference between operations within location, ANOVA, p<0.05

§§

Difference between mills, ANOVA, p<0.05