Table 4.
Logistic regression GEE | Linear regression GEE | Proposed two-step method |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allele | Stratum |
ÔR (or OR1/OR0) & 95% CIa |
p | β̂1 (or β̂3) and 95% CI | p | β̂1 (or β̂3) | p |
DRB1501 | HIV− | – | – | 0.0067 (−0.0061, 0.0194) | 0.3042 | 0.0067 | 0.0465 |
HIV+ | – | – | −0.0036 (−0.0075, 0.0003) | 0.0681 | −0.0036 | 0.8820 | |
Interaction | – | – | −0.0103 (−0.0241, 0.0035) | 0.1445 | −0.0103 | 0.0710 | |
BW4 | HIV− | – | – | −0.0015 (−.0044, 0.0014) | 0.3143 | −0.0015 | 0.0245 |
HIV+ | 1.771 (0.3277, 9.574) | 0.5067 | 0.0025 (−0.0043, 0.0093) | 0.4655 | 0.0025 | 0.6800 | |
Interaction | – | – | 0.0040 (−0.0034, 0.0114) | 0.2846 | 0.0040 | 0.4460 |
“–” indicates model was not converged.
We provided confidence interval (CI) estimates for the parameter of interest when the GEE models were converged. However, one should be cautious in interpreting these CIs because the asymptotical consistency and normality may not be valid under rare events even if the models are converged, as we demonstrated in the simulations.