Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 15;27(23):3842–3848. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6550

Table 3.

Overall Improvement (2006 IWG criteria) to Decitabine by Subgroup

Subgroup Patients With Overall Improvement (CR + mCR + PR + HI) Total No. of Patients in Subgroup %
Time from diagnosis to first dose, years
    < 1 35§ 63 56
    > 1 15 36 42
Type of MDS
    De novo 45§ 88 51
    Secondary 5 11 45
Patients with prior disease-modifying MDS therapy*
    No 38§ 72 53
    Yes 12 27 44
FAB classification
    RA + RARS 15§ 37 40
    RAEB + RAEB-T 27 51 53
    CMML 8 11 73
IPSS risk group
    Intermediate-1 26§ 52 50
    Intermediate-2 14 23 61
    High 10 23 43
Cytogenetic classification of risk
    Good 26§ 49 53
    Intermediate 10 15 67
    Poor 12 29 41

Abbreviations: IWG, International Working Group; CR, complete response; mCR, marrow CR; PR, partial response; HI, hematologic improvement; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; FAB, French-American-British; RA, refractory anemia; RARS, refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RAEB-T, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System.

*

Patients could have received more than one type of prior disease-modifying therapy.

Improvement rates by expert reviewer's FAB classification: RA+RARS (30%), RAEB+RAEB-T (56%), CMML (75%).

Patients with RA or RARS were required to have been red cell transfusion dependent to enroll.

§

Observed differences in overall improvement rates between subgroups did not achieve statistical significance.

IPSS was assigned to all patients, including those with secondary MDS or prior therapy.

Improvement rates by expert reviewer's IPSS classification: Intermediate-1 (46%), Intermediate-2 (59%), High (50%).