Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 25.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2008 Sep 23;29(2):194–198. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.002

Table 3.

Identification of subjects with unstable dynamic gait performance including Timed “Up & Go” > 11.1 s and dynamic gait index <20/24, using yaw and pitch plane gaze-stability test (GST) cutoff values

Identification category GST plane GST cutoff value (degree s−1) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Likelihood ratio AUC (95% confidence interval)
TUG > 11.1 s Yaw <63 100 89 9.1 0.96* (0.89–1.0)
Pitch <65 100 82 5.6 0.91 (0.79–1.0)
DGI < 20/24 Yaw <78   75 78 3.4 0.85* (0.67–1.0)
Pitch <65   75 82 4.2 0.80 (0.49–1.0)

Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) are shown.

*

p < 0.05.