Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2016 Mar;40(2):155–171. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.2.1

Table 3.

Random-Effects Medication Adherence Outcome Estimates and Tests for Treatment vs. Control Comparisons for Individual Theories and Models (109 Possible Comparisons)

K Effect size p (ES) 95% Confidence interval Standard error I2 Tau2 Q p (Q)
Adult learning theory 4 0.443 .011 0.101, 0.786 0.175 62.654 0.070 8.033 .045
Behavior modification theory 3 0.363 .004 0.118, 0.607 0.125 0 0 0.658 .720
Health belief model 7 0.477 .050 0, 0.954 0.243 85.656 0.324 41.829 <.001
Information-behavior-skill model 3 0.175 .201 −0.093, 0.444 0.137 0 0 1.019 .601
Motivational interviewing theory 12 0.392 .002 0.148, 0.637 0.125 84.346 0.126 70.268 <.001
Orem’s self-care theory 5 0.261 .377 −0.318, 0.841 0.296 64.525 0.255 11.275 .024
PRECEDE 3 0.041 .902 −0.612, 0.694 0.333 56.741 0.189 4.623 .099
Self-management model 3 0.334 .007 0.092, 0.576 0.123 0 0 0.714 .700
Self-regulation model 8 0.118 .286 −0.099, 0.335 0.111 19.221 0.018 8.666 .278
Social cognitive theory 18 0.350 <.001 0.117, 0.524 0.008 36.761 0.049 26.882 .060
Transtheoretical model 5 0.334 .106 −0.072, 0.740 0.207 57.785 0.103 9.475 .050

K denotes number of comparisons, ES is effect size, Q is a conventional homogeneity statistic, I2 is the percentage of total variation among studies’ observed ES due to heterogeneity. Only comparisons with at least three treatment vs. control comparisons were included.