Table 5. Results of the ROC analysis using the exploratory dataset.
Area under curve | Cut-off value | True positives | False negatives | True negatives | False positives | Sensitivity | Specificity | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professional vs rest | 0.693 | 0.0226 | 10 | 4 | 59 | 40 | 71.4 | 59.6 | 0.0097 |
Amateur vs rest | 0.725 | -0.0117 | 32 | 13 | 50 | 18 | 71.1 | 73.5 | <0.0001 |
Professional vs amateur | 0.800 | -0.0118 | 12 | 2 | 32 | 13 | 85.7 | 71.1 | <0.0001 |
Professional vs academy | 0.603 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
Amateur vs academy | 0.706 | -0.0044 | 33 | 12 | 37 | 17 | 73.3 | 68.5 | <0.0001 |
n.s.–not significant