Skip to main content
. 2016 May 25;16:435. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3122-x

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of study population according to Chinese famine exposure

Variables Non-exposed cohort
10/1/1962-9/30/1964
(n = 572)
Fetal-exposed cohort
10/1/1959-9/30/1961
(n = 599)
Infant-exposed cohort
1/1/1958-12/31/1958
(n = 338)
Preschool-exposed cohort
1/1/1956-12/31/1957
(n = 457)
Gender n (%)
 Male 275(48.1) 282(47.2) 176(52.1) 236(51.6)
 Female 297(51.9) 316(52.8) 162(47.9) 221(48.4)
Severity n (%)
 Severely 299(52.3) 317(52.9) 174(51.5) 250(54.7)
 Less severely 273(47.7) 282(47.1) 164(48.5) 207(45.3)
Smoking n (%)b
 YES 214(37.4) 223(37.3) 143(42.4) 212(46.4)
 NO 358(62.6) 375(62.7) 194(57.6) 245(53.6)
Drinking
 YES 86(15.0) 100(16.7) 57(16.9) 81(17.7)
 NO 486(85.0) 499(83.3) 281(83.1) 376(82.3)
Age mean(SD) yearsb 46.78(0.41) 50.41(0.62)d 52.54(0.50)d 54.30(0.70)d
BMI mean(SD) kg/m2a 24.75(3.85) 24.61(4.14) 24.00(3.46)c 23.78(3.65)d
SBP mean(SD) mmHgb,e 125.19(17.36) 127.90(20.18) 131.45(19.41)d, f 129.01(20.00)c, f
DBP mean(SD) mmHg 77.86(12.81) 77.95(12.70) 79.06(12.89) 77.47(12.55)

aMean values were significantly different among four birth cohorts (AVONA or χ 2 trend test; P < 0.01)

bMean values were significantly different among four birth cohorts (AVONA or χ 2 trend test; P < 0.001)

cMean values were significantly different between exposed cohorts and non-exposed cohort (Dunnet-t test, P < 0.05)

dMean values were significantly different between exposed cohorts and non-exposed cohort (Dunnet-t test, P < 0.01)

eMean values were significantly different by ANCOVA with BP as a dependent variable and age + BMI as covariates among four birth cohorts (P < 0.05)

fMean values were significantly different by ANCOVA with BP as a dependent variable and age + BMI as covariates between exposed cohorts and non-exposed cohort (P < 0.05)