Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;56(5):830–842. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00684

Table 2. AUC Values Determined on Training and Test Sets of Best Performing Ensembles Selected To Maximize AUCa.

  androgen receptor
CDK2
PPAR-δ
method size training test size training test size training test
exhaustive 6 0.894 ± 0.05 0.850 ± 0.04 4 0.934 ± 0.014 0.919 ± 0.019 6 0.950 ± 0.020 0.923 ± 0.023
slow heuristic 5 0.893 ± 0.04 0.850 ± 0.04 4 0.934 ± 0.014 0.919 ± 0.019 6 0.950 ± 0.020 0.923 ± 0.02
fast heuristic 3 0.890 ± 0.03 0.850 ± 0.04 4 0.934 ± 0.014 0.919 ± 0.019 8 0.942 ± 0.022 0.928 ± 0.03
a

The column labeled “size” gives the number of target conformations in the optimally performing ensemble identified by each method; 95% confidence intervals are given. Androgen receptor ensembles were constructed from 10 MD conformations identified using pocket volume clustering and a crystal structure. CDK2 ensembles were constructed from five MD conformations identified using RMSD-based pocket clustering and a crystal structure. PPAR-δ ensembles were constructed from 12 crystal structures.