Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 19;9(2):123–130. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2015.00955

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression analysis using body mass index for predicting hearing thresholds

Model Men
Women
NS-β±SE P-value NS-β±SE P-value
Model 1
 Low-Freq –0.249±0.147 0.092 –0.281±0.117 0.016
 Mid-Freq –0.135±0.185 0.466 –0.496±0.126 <0.001
 High-Freq –0.204±0.152 0.278 –0.616±0.117 <0.001
 AHT –0.190±0.152 0.211 –0.358±0.117 0.002
Model 2
 Low-Freq 0.039±0.143 0.785 –0.070±0.112 0.531
 Mid-Freq 0.183±0.181 0.312 –0.242±0.119 0.042
 High-Freq 0.085±0.185 0.646 –0.315±0.126 0.012
 AHT 0.103±0.147 0.483 –0.133±0.111 0.232
Model 3
 Low-Freq 0.101±0.142 0.478 –0.100±0.107 0.348
 Mid-Freq 0.201±0.194 0.299 –0.213±0.118 0.070
 High-Freq 0.139±0.207 0.501 –0.239±0.132 0.071
 AHT 0.154±0.150 0.304 –0.112±0.105 0.287

NS-β, nonstandardized β; Freq, frequency; AHT, average hearing threshold.

Model 1 was unadjusted, model 2 was adjusted for age, and model 3 was adjusted for age, mean daily alcohol intake, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, exposure to explosive noise, and exposure to occupational noise.