Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015 May 7;14(6):1281–1302. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0674-0

Table 3.

Comparisons of the local in-surface principal strains in the central regions of the MV leaflets between the in vitro measurements and FE numerical predictions with various levels of model fidelity

λR
λC
MVAL MVPL MVAL MVPL
30 mmHg transvalvular pressure
FE predictions—Level I 1.393 ± 0.054 1.487 ± 0.048 1.068 ± 0.023 1.048 ± 0.023
FE predictions—Level II 1.365 ± 0.039 1.448 ± 0.049 1.061 ± 0.023 1.043 ± 0.022
FE predictions—Level III 1.357 ± 0.041 1.437 ± 0.044 1.057 ± 0.021 1.038 ± 0.023
FE predictions—Level IV 1.341 ± 0.035 1.414 ± 0.039 1.049 ± 0.020 1.034 ± 0.021
In vitro measurements 1.336 ± 0.031 1.421 ± 0.035 1.048 ± 0.019 1.031 ± 0.016
70 mmHg transvalvular pressure
FE predictions—Level I 1.452 ± 0.059 1.556 ± 0.049 1.149 ± 0.038 1.126 ± 0.037
FE predictions—Level II 1.431 ± 0.037 1.532 ± 0.053 1.139 ± 0.039 1.118 ± 0.036
FE predictions—Level III 1.416 ± 0.044 1.508 ± 0.052 1.137 ± 0.037 1.115 ± 0.036
FE predictions—Level IV 1.393 ± 0.034 1.477 ± 0.047 1.124 ± 0.035 1.109 ± 0.032
In vitro measurements 1.386 ± 0.034 1.483 ± 0.037 1.116 ± 0.035 1.108 ± 0.021