Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;17(5):626. doi: 10.3390/ijms17050626

Table 1.

Summary form of typical in vivo delivery systems and candidates for genome editing nucleases and their expression cassette.

Typical Delivery Systems Assessment Genome Editing Nuclease Clinical Trials
Advantages Disadvantages Phase Status Clinical Trials. Gov Identifier Reference
AAVs High efficiency Low packaging capacity, cost high ZFNs, CRISPR/Cas9 [59,73,74,104]
AdVs Low off-target mutagenesis Immunoreactivity, high cost ZFNs I Completed NCT01044654 [49,105,106]
II Completed NCT01252641
I Completed NCT00842634
HCAdVs High packaging capacity Cell-specific targeting is difficult to achieve TALENs [32]
CPP, e.g., TAT-TALEN proteins; CPP-Cas9 proteins Low off-target mutagenesis Immunoreactivity TALENs, CRISPR/Cas9 [63,64,86]
Candidates for delivering plasmids of nucleases DOTAP-cholesterol Easy to produce, large packaging capacity Large particle size, low targeting efficiency, toxic I/II Active NCT01455389 [8]
PEI Easy to produce, large packaging capacity Low targeting efficiency, toxic II Active NCT00595088
PEG-PEI-Cholesterol Easy to produce, large packaging capacity with small particle size, low toxic Low targeting efficiency II Active NCT01118052