Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;17(5):720. doi: 10.3390/ijms17050720

Table 2.

Effect of HB12 and TT8 down-regulation on carbohydrate subfractions in model forage (Medicago sativa spp. Sativa: Alfalfa) a.

Items Non-Transgenic (NT) Gene silencing through RNAi Technology (GS) SEM b p Value Contrast, p Value
Control HB12 TT8 NT vs. GS
Fractions of Carbohydrate Partitioned by CNCPS c (% CHO)
CA4 7.37 4.18 4.41 0.867 0.135 0.063
CB1 5.26 a 2.04 b 2.58 b 0.334 0.012 0.006
CB2 49.35 49.79 49.41 1.201 0.962 0.876
CB3 29.89 29.64 31.30 1.534 0.735 0.779
CC 8.14 14.36 12.31 1.908 0.209 0.113

a means with different letters within the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05); b SEM: stand error of the mean; The Tukey-Kramer method was used for multi-treatment comparison; c CNCPS: Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System; Carbohydrate CNCPS fractions undetected in alfalfa populations include: CA1 fraction (volatile fatty acids), CA2 fraction (lactate acid), CA3 (other organic acids). Measurable CNCPS alfalfa carbohydrate fractions include: CA4 (sugar), CB1 (starch), CB2 (soluble fiber), CB3 (available NDF) and CC (indigestible fiber).