Skip to main content
. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0155964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155964

Table 5. Cox Regressions comparing Maternal Sensitivity and Linguistic Stimulation.

Oral Language Symbolic Play Noun Class
Estimate (SE) HR Estimate (SE) HR Estimate (SE) HR
Contrasts
Hearing controls 2.43 (0.26)* 11.33 (6.75 to 19.01) 0.40 (0.22) 1.48 (0.97 to 2.28) 1.74 (0.29)* 5.67 (3.23 to 9.97)
High Maternal Sensitivity and High Linguistic Stimulation Reference Category Reference Category Reference Category
Either Low Maternal Sensitivity or Low Linguistic Stimulation -0.64 (0.21)* 0.53 (0.35 to 0.80) 0.02 (0.22) 1.02 (0.67 to 1.56) -0.37 (0.20) 0.69 (0.47 to 1.03)
Control Variables
Maternal Education (years) 0.25 (0.05)* 1.28 (1.16 to 1.41) 0.09 (0.05) 1.09 (0.99 to 1.05) 0.15 (0.06)* 1.16 (1.03 to 1.31)
Child’s Age at Enrollment (years) -0.76 (0.08)* 0.47 (0.40 to 0.55) -0.65 (0.12)* 0.52 (0.42 to 0.66) -0.80 (0.09)* 0.45 (0.38 to 0.53)
Child’s Gender (0 = Male; 1 = Female 0.03 (0.14) 1.03 (0.78 to 1.36) 0.58 (0.17)* 1.79 (1.27 to 2.51) 0.43 (0.19)* 1.54 (1.06 to 2.26)
Child’s IQ (in standard deviation units) 0.16 (0.06)* 1.16 (1.04 to 1.33) -0.06 (0.06) 0.94 (0.84 to 1.06) 0.17 (0.06)* 1.19 (1.06 to 1.34)

SE = Standard Error; HR = Hazard Ratio.

* p < .05.