Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2016 Apr 29;59(10):5051–5062. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00465

Table 4.

Comparison of biochemical inhibition against RT RNase H, RT pol and INST

Compd RT RNase H IC50a(µM) RT Pol IC50 (µM) IN IC50 (µM)
10a >25 >25 >100
10b >25 >25 37
10c >25 >25 35
10d 17 >25 35
10e 16 ± 4.5 >25 34
10f 17 ± 5.2 >25 >100
10g 13 ± 2.1 >25 >100
10h 17 >25 67
10i 14 >25 36
10j 12 >25 25
10k 18 ± 2.8 >25 44.5 ± 18.1
10l >25 >25 >100
10m 18 ± 4.5 >25 >100
10n >25 >25 >100
10o >25 >25 >100
10p >25 >25 >100
10q 2.5 ± 0.2 >25 >100
10r 2.7 ± 0.6 8.5 ± 1.5 23
10s 7.0 ± 0.7 19 ± 5.5 2.26 ± 0.87
10t 1.5 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.1 14
10u 7.7 ± 2.4 >25 17
10v 2.5 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.1 22
10w 3.2 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.8 7.79 ± 1.93
10x 0.90 ± 0.05 1.1 ± 0.1 16.0 ± 6.5
10y 0.65 ± 0.05 1.2± 0.1 >100
10z 3.6 ± 0.2 >25 35.0 ± 10.0
18 >25 >25 >100
20 12 ± 1.8 >25 32
22 7.5 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.1 >100
a

Data with HTS-1 as substrate