Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;6:26305. doi: 10.1038/srep26305

Table 2. Comparison of strength and toughness reinforcement efficiencies for current and selected literature works.

Specimen Reinforcement type CNT vol%a Δσb, [%] Reinforcement efficiency (ησ)c ΔRd, [%] Reinforcement efficiency (ηR)e Reference
Al2O3-PVA (4L) Interphase 0.025% 50% 2000 70% 2800 This work
Glass-PVB Interphase 0.012% 89% 7415 90% 7500 This work
PC Solvent dispersion 5% 32% 6.4 42
Epoxy Solvent dispersion 0.3% 17% 57 43
Epoxy Solvent dispersion 0.5% 25% 50 46% 92 44
PMMA Melt dispersion 1% 170% 170 45
Carbon fiber-Epoxy Fiber grafting 0.5% 40% 80 21
Al2O3 Ceramic 10% 194% 19.4 20
Al2O3 Ceramic 10% 9% 0.9 46
Glass-PVB Laminate 1.5% 30% 20 341% 227 40
Preform-Epoxy Laminate 0.3% 48% 160 43
SiC fabric-Epoxy Laminate 2% 240% 120 348% 174 47
PEI/PAA Layer-by-layer 50% 2400% 48 48

aWhenever applicable, calculated from weight fraction (wt%) using the CNT density of 1.8 g/cm3 27.

bCalculated by: Δσ = (σreinforced − σplain)/σplain * 100%, where σ is the reported composite yield strength.

cCalculated by: ησ = Δσ/CNT vol%.

dCalculated by: ΔR = (Rreinforced − Rplain)/Rplain * 100%, where R is the reported composite toughness, fracture toughness or work of fracture.

eCalculated by: ηR = ΔR/CNT vol%.