Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;8(5):290. doi: 10.3390/nu8050290

Table 1.

Comparison of relationships between vitamin D concentration status and living area (urban/rural), wealth grouping, and geographic region, among women.

Comparisons: Women (1) Vitamin D (1) p-Value 1
n Mean (nmol/L) SD (nmol/L) Median (nmol/L) 25th Percentile P25 (nmol/L) 75th Percentile P75 (nmol/L)
Total 725 69.7 31.2 64.9 47.5 88.2 -
Living Area Urban 148 67.7 29.7 60.6 46.6 85.7 0.301
Rural 577 70.2 31.6 66.8 47.8 89.0
Wealth Group Poorest 155 71.7 34.2 66.6 47.8 92.3 0.358
Poorer 152 72.3 31.4 69.0 50.3 93.5
Middle 131 67.7 30.2 63.0 43.9 88.2
Richer 136 71.0 31.5 66.4 48.0 90.4
Richest 151 65.5 28.2 61.9 46.2 79.3
Region 2 Northeast 101 62.0 26.7 57.1 41.9 73.8 0.001
Southwest 142 77.2 33.6 73.4 54.4 99.6
Southeast 235 69.8 30.0 66.2 47.6 86.7
North 102 64.8 35.9 57.8 36.9 85.7
West 145 71.0 28.7 67.0 51.6 84.4

1 Nonparametric (distribution-free) tests were performed since the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated departure of vitamin D concentration data from normality (p = 0.000). Mann-Whitney Test was applied on two independent samples form living areas. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied on the independent samples with respect to wealth Group and region; 2 region: Northeast (Kratie, Mondol Kiri, Ratanak kiri, Stung Treng); Southwest (Kampong Speu, Kampot, Koh Kong, Sihanouk, Takeo); Southeast (Tboung Khmum, Svay Rieng, Prey Veng, Phnom Penh, Kandal, Kampong Chhnnang, Kampong Cham); North (Banteay Mean Chey, Preah Vihar, Ottar Mean Chey); and West (Siem Reap, Pailin, Pursat, Battambang, Kampong Thom).