. 2016 May 26;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0161-z

Table 3.

Comparison of specific estimates for different response patterns across subscales

	Response vector			3-Dimensional model			4-Dimensional model
Case#	N	A	C	${\hat{θ}}_{N}$	${\hat{θ}}_{A}$	${\hat{θ}}_{C}$	${\hat{θ}}_{N}$	${\hat{θ}}_{A}$	${\hat{θ}}_{C}$	${\hat{θ}}_{ERS}$
885	111111111111	555555555555	555553553555	–7.10	5.26	5.82	–2.23	1.47	0.30	3.71
151	111111111111	544555555555	442443452444	–6.17	3.81	-0.03	–3.59	1.80	–0.98	2.15
154	222222222222	444444444444	444444444444	–1.09	0.41	0.59	–1.93	0.92	1.65	–1.13
202	222222222222	444445445454	345443254332	–1.06	0.85	–1.38	–0.99	0.65	–1.14	0.88

Note: N = Neuroticism; A = Agreeableness; C = Conscientiousness; ERS = Extreme response style. Estimates for Neuroticism are indicated in boldface type