Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 21;17(2):120–129. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325

Table 1.

Baseline characteristic of the studies comparing patients with ACS vs. SA

Study author Number of included patients ACS/SA Age (mean ± SD or CI) ACS vs. SA Male gender (%) ACS/SA Type of CT generation
Leber et al.5 21/19 64 ± 8/68 ± 9 86/89 4-slice
Imazeki et al.12 31/26 60 ± 12/60 ± 8 87/92 4-slice
Kunimasa et al.22 21/53 64 ± 1/66 ± 2 95/77 16-slice
Motoyama et al.23 38/33 62 ± 11/67 ± 9 81/70 16-slice
Hoffmann et al.11 14/9 60 ± 8/63 ± 7 90/93 16-slice
Pundziute et al.8 25/25 57 ± 11/61 ± 11 72/56 64-slice
Hammer-Hansen et al.24 57/19 58 (53–66)/57 (55–67) 90/90 64-slice
Kitagawa et al.25 21/80 66 ± 11/69 ± 9 81/76 64-slice
Kim et al.17 35/36 64 ± 12/65 ± 14 49/47 64-slice
Pflederer et al.6 55/55 62 ± 11/64 ± 9 67/67 DSCT
Sato et al.9 ACS/SA with abnormal MPI/normal MPI 60/67/83 64 ± 10/67 ± 12/66 ± 10 49/40/49 64-slice
Ferencik et al.16 21/13 61 (51–67)/58 (49–65) 86/85 64-slice
Nakanishi et al.19 10/124 68 ± 15/70 ± 11 60/70 64-slice
Sudarski et al.26 15/13 72 ± 9/71.4 ± 8 87/77 DSCT
Yang et al.10 65/75 62 ± 20/63 ± 21 65/64 DSCT
Versteylen et al.14 25/101 60 ± 11/60 ± 10 56/60 64-slice
Puchner et al.7 37/435 57 ± 8/53 ± 8 84/50 64- to 256-slice
Dey et al.15 14/14 61 ± 11/59 ± 12 86/86 DSCT

CI, confidence interval; DSCT, dual-source computed tomography; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging.