Table 3.
N a | ADRs, n (%) | Logistic regression analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95 % CI | p value | |||
Total dose of fluvoxamine, gb | |||||
≤2 | 328 | 207 (63.1) | 0.631 | 0.594, 0.670 | <0.0001 |
2–4 | 126 | 26 (20.6) | |||
4–8 | 160 | 22 (13.8) | |||
8–12 | 118 | 19 (16.1) | |||
12–16 | 95 | 11 (11.6) | |||
16–20 | 157 | 10 (6.4) | |||
20–24 | 75 | 5 (6.7) | |||
24–28 | 81 | 11 (13.6) | |||
28–32 | 79 | 3 (3.8) | |||
32–36 | 68 | 2 (2.9) | |||
36–40 | 91 | 3 (3.3) | |||
>40 | 408 | 4 (1.0) | |||
Unknown | 4 | 3 (75.0) | |||
Maximum daily dose of fluvoxamine, mgb | |||||
≤25 | 65 | 18 (27.7) | 0.714 | 0.663, 0.768 | <0.0001 |
25–50 | 423 | 142 (33.6) | |||
50–75 | 177 | 22 (12.4) | |||
75–100 | 447 | 79 (17.7) | |||
100–125 | 14 | 2 (14.3) | |||
125–150 | 505 | 46 (9.1) | |||
>150 mg | 155 | 14 (9.0) | |||
Final daily dose of fluvoxamine, mgb | |||||
≤25 | 118 | 22 (18.6) | 0.775 | 0.721, 0.833 | <0.0001 |
25–50 | 505 | 146 (28.9) | |||
50–75 | 172 | 23 (13.4) | |||
75–100 | 457 | 82 (17.9) | |||
100–125 | 11 | 3 (27.3) | |||
125–150 | 407 | 3 (8.6) | |||
>150 | 116 | 12 (10.3) | |||
Baseline LSAS-J total score | |||||
≤29 | 97 | 16 (16.5) | 1.007 | 0.956, 1.060 | 0.7961 |
30–39 | 81 | 12 (14.8) | |||
40–49 | 130 | 25 (19.2) | |||
50–59 | 173 | 35 (20.2) | |||
60–69 | 191 | 35 (18.3) | |||
70–79 | 224 | 40 (17.9) | |||
80–89 | 211 | 43 (20.4) | |||
90–99 | 213 | 37 (17.4) | |||
≥100 | 323 | 59 (18.3) | |||
≤59 | 481 | 88 (18.3) | 1.008 | 0.766, 1.327 | 0.9540 |
≥60 | 1,162 | 214 (18.4) |
ADR adverse drug reaction, CI confidence interval, LSAS-J Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Japanese version, N number of patients, OR odds ratio
aPatients with no relevant information were excluded from analysis
bTotal dose of fluvoxamine for patients with ADRs was calculated as total dose by the onset of the first ADR