Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 20;4:13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-014-0013-7

Table 3.

Sample statistics by county (N) by regime (REG1, REG2, REG3), mammography sample (female, 2003-2005)

REG11R14 = 1 & R25 = 1 (N = 2,056) REG21R14 = 1 & R25 = 0 (N = 632) REG31R14 = 0 & R25 = 0 (N = 445)reference group
% Mammography screening in 2003-2005, among FFS Medicare population 56.6 (7.5) 53.9 (7.6) 54.7 (8.5)
% Age 65-74 in FFS Medicare 61.3 (4.7) 63.1 (4.1) 60.8 (5.2)
% Age 75-84 in FFS Medicare 31.3 (3.4) 29.9 (3.1) 31.1 (3.6)
% Age 85+ in FFS Medicare 7.4 (1.8) 7.0 (1.8) 8.1 (2.3)
% Dual or ESRD in FFS Medicare 20.3 (10.0) 23.6 (11.7) 21.4 (14.1)
% White in FFS Medicare 87.9 (11.5) 83.1 (12.2) 85.2 (15.5)
% Black in FFS Medicare 5.2 (9.7) 7.2 (10.5) 8.0 (14.8)
% Hispanic in FFS Medicare 0.38 (1.5) 2.5 (5.8) 0.15 (0.4)
% Other race in FFS Medicare 6.6 (6.4) 7.1 (7.2) 6.6 (6.5)
% Mover in 2001-2005 in FFS Medicare 5.6 (2.6) 6.1 (2.3) 5.1 (2.3)
Average distance to closest provider 11.6 (23.1) 16.6 (18.5) 19.9 (17.1)
Managed care penetration, 2001 12.3 (13.3) 7.9 (10.8) 2.2 (4.3)
Managed care penetration, 1998 0.3 (2.1) 0.1 (0.3) 0.1 (0.1)
Population density in 2001 (in thousands) 12.6 (4.5) 15.2 (5.2) 14.1 (5.5)
% US population in poverty in 2001 47 62.5 25
% states allowing NP to practice and/or prescribe 11.8 (4.5) 15.0 (3.7) 18.1 (7.8)
% of counties with MD Shortage 63.9 (8.2) 56.9 (9.4) 65.3 (11.6)
% of Medicare population with Supplemental MediGap 63.1 64 78.5

1We defined three insurance regulatory ‘regimes’ based on the combination of the two state insurance regulatory variables (R14, external review and R25, continuity of care.

Regime 1 (REG1) was defined as having both regulations in place (R14 = 1, R25 = 1). Regime 2 (REG2) was defined as having only one of these regulations in place (R14 = 1). Regime 3 (REG3) included all other states, which had neither regulation. See Table 7 for Regime Membership by States.