Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 20;4:13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-014-0013-7

Table 4.

Sample statistics by county (N) by regime (REG1, REG2, REG3), endoscopy sample (male and female, 2001-2005)

REG11R14 = 1 & R25 = 1 (N = 2,056) REG21R14 = 1 & R25 = 0 (N = 632) REG31R14 = 0 & R25 = 0 (N = 445)reference group
% Screening for colorectal cancer 2001-2005, among FFS Medicare enrollees 37.8 (6.0) 35.5 (6.4) 34.8 (5.9)
% Age 65-74 in FFS Medicare 59.8 (4.6) 61.5 (4.1) 59.2 (5.0)
% Age 75-84 in FFS Medicare 33.5 (3.4) 32.2 (3.2) 33.5 (3.6)
% Age 85+ in FFS Medicare 6.7 (1.6) 6.4 (1.6) 7.3 (2.0)
% Dual or ESRD in FFS Medicare 19.3 (9.7) 22.3 (11.1) 20.1 (12.8)
% White in FFS Medicare 92.9 (11.5) 88.1 (12.6) 90.2 (15.4)
% Black in FFS Medicare 5.2 (9.7) 7.2 (10.4) 8.0 (14.9)
% Hispanic in FFS Medicare 0.4 (1.7) 3.0 (6.7) 0.2 (0.4)
% Other race in FFS Medicare 1.5 (6.3) 1.7 (7.3) 1.6 (6.1)
% Mover in 2001-2005 in FFS Medicare 9.0 (3.7) 11.2 (11.6) 8.2 (3.4)
Average distance to closest provider 8.8 (20.3) 11.9 (12.3) 14.2 (12.7)
managed care penetration, 2001 12.1 (12.5) 6.9 (9.6) 2.3 (4.1)
managed care penetration, 1998 13.6 (14.7) 8.5 (11.9) 3.4 (6.6)
Population density in 2001 (in thousands) 0.3 (2.0) 0.1 (0.3) 0.0 (0.1)
% US population in poverty in 2001 12.7 (5.3) 15.9 (6.1) 15.1 (6.4)
% states allowing NP to practice and/or prescribe 47 62.5 25
% of counties with MD Shortage 11.8 (4.5) 15.0 (3.7) 18.1 (7.8)
% of Medicare population with Supplemental MediGap 63.9 (8.2) 56.9 (9.4) 65.3 (11.6)
% Market Share Largest 3 Insurers in state, 2001 63.1 64 78.5

1We defined three insurance regulatory ‘regimes’ based on the combination of the two state insurance regulatory variables (R14, external review and R25, continuity of care.

Regime 1 (REG1) was defined as having both regulations in place (R14 = 1, R25 = 1). Regime 2 (REG2) was defined as having only one of these regulations in place (R14 = 1). Regime 3 (REG3) included all other states, which had neither regulation. See Table 7 for Regime Membership by States.