Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2012 Aug 25;527(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.08.030

Table 2.

Results from post hoc analyses performed on locations identified as significant by ANOVA.

“Cue”
“Jaw”
L cuneus L insula L MFG L IFG L pre CG R STG R Post CG
Mouth open
L insula p< 0.005 L preCG ns
L MFG p< 0.005 ns R STG p < 0.005 ns
R Pre CG p< 0.005 p< 0.005 p< 0.005 R Post CG p < 0.005 ns ns
R Pre CG p < 0.005 ns ns ns
L cuneus R insula L MFG R IFG L uncus L STG R IFG R Pre CG R STG
/pa/
R insula p< 0.005 L STG ns
L MFG p< 0.005 ns R IFG ns ns
R IFG p< 0.005 p< 0.005 p< 0.005 R Pre CG ns ns ns
R Pre CG p< 0.005 p< 0.005 p< 0.005 ns R STG p < 0.05 ns ns ns
L IFG p< 0.05 p <0.05 p<0.05 ns ns

L, left; R, right; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; Pre CG, pre-central gyrus; Post CG, post-central gyrus.