Table 5.
Effect of community engagement interventions on health worker perceptions (n = 468)
| Matching algorithm | Outcome Indicators | aATT (T-stat) | SE | Number of Intervention | Number of Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nearest Neighbor (NN) | Perception factor1 | 1.94(−0.26)** | 0.080 | 194 | 221 |
| Perception factor2 | 2.46(−0.71) | 0.165 | 36 | 39 | |
| Perception factor3 | 2.56(−0.25)** | 0.089 | 200 | 229 | |
| Perception factor4 | 1.72(−1.37)* | 0.099 | 98 | 102 | |
| Perception factor5 | 2.48(−0.46)** | 0.082 | 194 | 218 | |
| Overall | 2.24(0.13) | 0.178 | 21 | 17 | |
| Perceived impact1 | 2.07(2.60)** | 0.074 | 198 | 223 | |
| Perceived impact2 | 1.18(1.36)** | 0.062 | 201 | 223 | |
| Perceived impact3 | 1.38(1.44)** | 0.067 | 201 | 224 | |
| Overall | 1.72(3.66)** | 0.052 | 198 | 221 |
Source: WOTRO-COHEiSION Ghana Project (2014); *Psuedo-R2 (p < 1.0); **Pseudo-R2 (p < 0.05)
aATT (Average treatment effect on the treated). The ATT values are the propensity score matching output and they depict the impact of the treatment (SCE interventions) on each of the staff motivation markers, high values imply higher treatment effect and vice versa
Legend: SE (Standard Error); Perception factor1 (Feedback channels and stakeholder engagement); Perception factor2 (Information provision, adequacy, accessibility); Perception factor3 (Availability and quality of drugs covered by NHIS); Perception factor4 (Reimbursements and benefits package); Perception factor5 (Trustworthiness and complaint handling); Overall perception (Overall score based on all five perception variables). Perceived impact1 (Workload and health resource); Perceived impact2 (Client waiting time and queuing system); Perceived impact3 (Quality of time spent per client); Overall perceived impact (Overall score based on all 3 perception variables on impact of NHIS on quality health service delivery)