. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Apr 28;56:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.04.007

Table 4.

Results of standardized regression model predicting strength of negative and positive parenting PTC^a.

	β Coefficient	SE	t	F (df)
Negative parenting PTC
Intercept	−0.02	.18	−0.12
Maltreatment by parent	0.20	.27	0.74
History of sexual abuse	−0.03	.24	−0.13
Number of CM experiences	0.25	.11	2.38^*
Demographic risk	−0.05	.10	−0.52
Reduced Model				1.54 (4, 95)
Positive parenting PTC^b
Intercept	1.90	.20	9.74^***
Maltreatment by parent	−0.57	.28	−2.01^*
History of sexual abuse	−0.11	.26	−0.41
Number of CM experiences	0.01	.03	0.39
Demographic risk	−0.07	.09	−0.72
Number CM experiences X Demographic risk	0.08	.04	2.22^*
Full Model	R² = .13			2.84 (5, 94)^*

Note:

Results are final models that include maltreatment by parent figure (0 = yes; 1 = no), lifetime experience of sexual abuse (experienced sexual abuse; 1 = no; 2 = yes), number CM experiences, and current demographic risk as covariates. If interaction terms were not significant, reduced models are presented excluding interactions.

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001.