Skip to main content
. 2016 May 26;5(8):1791–1801. doi: 10.1002/cam4.750

Table 5.

Comparison of previous reports concerning c.309T>G and lung cancer prognosis

Author Year Country Ethnic group Smoker (%) Stage Histology Subgroup N MDM2 c.309T>G SNP309 HR 95% CI P Correlation Ref.
Heist 2007 States Caucasian 93% Stage I, II NSCLC 383 T//T vs. G/G 1.57 1.03–2.40 0.04 G/G risk 15
AC 186 T/T vs. G/G 0.93 0.48–1.80 0.82 NS
SQ 110 T/T vs. G/G 3.77 1.88–7.57 0.0002 G/G risk
Stage IA 200 T/T vs. G/G 0.65 0.33–1.27 0.2 NS
Stage IB or II 183 T/T vs. G/G 3.19 1.80–5.65 <0.0001 G/G risk
Noncurrent smoker 233 T/T vs. G/G 1.17 0.66–2.08 0.58 NS
Current smoker 150 T/T vs. G/G 2.93 1.52–5.67 0.001 G/G risk
Han 2008 Korea Asian 75% Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC 148 T/T vs. T/G + G/G 1.74 1.05–2.89 0.032 T/G + G/G risk 16
Chua 2010 Singapore Asian 0% Lung cancer 123 T/T vs. T/G vs. G/G NA 0.27(log‐rank) N.S. 18
Chien 2010 Taiwan Asian 51% Stage I‐III NSCLC 198 T/T vs. G/G 0.62 0.41–0.95 0.003 T/T risk 17
Stage I 127 T/T vs. G/G 0.47 0.22–1.01 0.05 NS
Stage I with wild‐type p53 99 T/T vs. G/G 0.34 0.15–0.80 0.01 T/T risk
Stage I with p53 mutation 28 T/T vs. G/G 5.02 0.31–28.20 0.35 NS
Stage II, III 179 T/T vs. G/G 0.82 0.48–1.39 0.45 NS
Liu 2011 China Asian 59% Stage III or IV NSCLC 199 T/T vs. G/G 1.05 0.66–1.67 0.91(log‐rank) NS 19
Dong 2011 China Asian 72% Stage I‐IV NSCLC 561 G/G vs. T/T + T/G 1.37 1.06–1.78 0.017 T/T + T/G risk 20
Ryan 2012 States Caucasian and African‐American 92% Stage I‐IV NSCLC 197 T/T vs. G/G 0.8 0.51–1.24 0.31 NS 12
This study 2015 Japan Asian 45% Stage I AC 179 T/G + G/G vs. T/T 2.23 1.07–4.65 0.033 T/T risk

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., Reference; NSCLC, non‐small‐cell lung cancer; NS, not significant; NA, not available; AC, adenocarcinoma; SQ, squamous cell carcinoma.