Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 29.
Published in final edited form as: Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:499–524. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00040-1

Table 40.1.

Summary of previous studies investigating the effectiveness of inhibitory rTMS or tDCS over primary motor cortex of unaffected hemisphere on motor behavior

Technique Reference Area of stimulation No. of patients, mean age, lesion location, and time since stroke Study design Control condition Stimulation parameters Main results
rTMS, low frequency Mansur et al., 2005 Hand area of M1 and dorsal PMC, unaffected hemisphere 10 adults, 54 years, 10 subcortical, <12 months Single-blind, crossover, sham- controlled Real TMS, sham TMS (sham coil), real TMS over PMC 1 Hz, 100% rMT, 10 min Decrease in simple and choice RTs and improved performance of Purdue Pegboard Test with affected hand after real rTMS
rTMS, low frequency Takeuchi et al., 2005 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 20 adults, 59 years, 20 subcortical, 6–60 months Double-blind, randomized, sham- controlled 20 patients, 10 real TMS, 10 sham TMS (perpendicular to the scalp ) 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 25 min Real rTMS reduced MEP amplitude in contralesional M1 and abnormal transcallosal inhibition. Moreover rTMS induced improvement in pinch acceleration
rTMS, low frequency Fregni et al., 2006 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 15 adults, 56 years, 2 cortical, 13 subcortical, 1–11 years Single-blind, longitudinal, randomized, sham- controlled, Phase II 15 patients, 10 real TMS, 5 patients sham TMS (sham coil) 1 Hz, 100% MT, 20 min, repeated daily over 5 days Real TMS resulted in improvement of motor function performance (Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test, simple and choice RTs, Purdue Pegboard Test) in affected hand that lasted for 2 weeks. Corticospinal excitability decreased in stimulated unaffected hemisphere and increased in affected hemisphere
rTMS, low frequency Boggio et al., 2006 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 1 adult, 74-year- old woman, subcortical, 23–107 months Double-blind, crossover, single-case study Real TMS, sham TMS (sham coil) over M1 1 Hz, 100% rMT, 20 min rTMS improved motor function (thumb and finger movements)
rTMS, low frequency Liepert et al., 2007 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 12 adults, 64 years, 12 subcortical, <14 days Double-blind, crossover, sham- controlled Real TMS, sham TMS (sham coil) 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 20 min Real rTMS improved Nine Hole Peg Test results but not grip strength in affected hand
rTMS, low frequency Dafotakis et al., 2008 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 12 adults, 45 years, 12 subcortical, 1–15 months Double-blind, crossover, sham- controlled Real TMS, sham TMS over vertex 1 Hz, 100% rMT, 10 min Real rTMS improved efficiency and timing of grasping and lifting with affected hand
rTMS, low frequency Nowak et al., 2008 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 15 adults, 46 years, 15 subcortical, 1–4 months Double-blind, crossover, sham- controlled Real TMS, sham TMS over vertex 1 Hz, 100 rMT, 10 min Real rTMS improved kinematics of finger and grasp movements in affected hand and reduced overactivity in contralesional M1 and nonprimary motor areas. Overactivity of contralesional dorsal PMC, contralesional parietal operculum, and ipsilesional mesial frontal cortex at baseline predicted improvement of movement
rTMS, low frequency Kirton et al., 2008 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 10 children, 14 years, 10 subcortical, 3–13 years Single-blind, longitudinal, randomized, sham controlled 10 patients, 5 real TMS, 5 sham TMS (perpendicular to scalp) 1 Hz, 100% rMT, 20 min repeated daily for 8 days Real rTMS improved grip strength and Melbourne assessment of upper extremity function
rTMS, low frequency Takeuchi et al., 2008 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 20 adults, 62 years, 20 subcortical, 7–121 months Double-blind, randomized, sham- controlled 20 patients, 10 real TMS, 10 sham TMS (perpendicular to scalp) 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 25 min +motor training Real rTMS induced an increase in excitability in affected hemisphere and improvement in acceleration of affected hand. Improvements in motor function lasted for 1 week
rTMS, priming stimulation Carey et al., 2008 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 10 adults, 66 years, 8 cortical, 2 subcortical, 16–192 months No sham rTMS, sham- controlled 10 patients real TMS 10 min of 6 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT. Immediately after, 10 min of 1 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT Safety of treatment. No seizures and impairment in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd edition), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised, Beck Depression Inventory (2nd edition)
rTMS, priming stimulation Carey et al., 2010 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 2 adults, with middle cerebral artery stroke, 71-year-old male, 52-year-old female, >10 years Longitudinal, no sham rTMS, sham- controlled 2 patients real TMS 10 min of 6 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT. Immediately after, 10 min of 1 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT, 5 sessions fMRI showed that intervention disrupted cortical activation at contralesional M1. Behavioral results (Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log) were mixed
rTMS, priming stimulation Kakuda et al., 2011 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 11 adults, 61 years, 11 subcortical, average 70.2 months Longitudinal, no sham rTMS, sham- controlled 5 patients real TMS 10 min of 6 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT. Immediately after, 20 min of 1 Hz (600 pulses), 90% rMT+OT, 15-day protocol, 22 sessions rTMS improved Fugl–Meyer score and shortened log performance time of Wolf Motor Function Test
rTMS, low frequency Kakuda et al., 2010a Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 5 adults, 66.8 years, 5 subcortical, 14.6 months Longitudinal, no sham rTMS, sham- controlled 5 patients real TMS 1 Hz (20 min, 90% rMT)+OT, 10 sessions over 6 consecutive days Improvements in scores of Fugl– Meyer Assessment, Wolf Motor Function Test, and Ten-Second Test. No deterioration of improved upper limb function observed at 4 weeks after treatment
rTMS, low frequency Kakuda et al., 2010b Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 15 adults, 55 years, 15 subcortical, 57±55 months Longitudinal Real TMS 1 Hz, 1200 pulses, 90% MT, 22 sessions in 2-week period combined with OT Fugl–Meyer Assessment score increased in all 15 patients. Shortening of performance time on Wolf Motor Function Test noted in 12 patients. Modified Ashworth Scale score for some flexor muscles decreased in 12 patients
rTMS, low frequency Grefkes et al., 2010 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 11 adults, 46 years, 11 subcortical, 1–3 months Single-blind, crossover, sham- controlled Real TMS, sham TMS over vertex 1 Hz, 100% rMT, 10 min Real rTMS improved motor performance of paretic hand. Connectivity analysis (Dynamic Causal Modeling) revealed that behavioral improvements were significantly correlated with a reduction of negative influences originating from contralesional M1 during paretic hand movements. Concurrently, endogenous coupling between ipsilesional SMA and M1 was significantly enhanced only after rTMS
rTMS, low frequency Conforto et al., 2012 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 30 adults, 55.75 years, 14 corticosub- cortical, 16 subcortical, average 27.65 days Double-blind, randomized, longitudinal, sham- controlled 30 patients, 15 real TMS, 15 sham TMS (perpendicular to vertex) 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 25 min, 10 sessions Real rTMS improved performance in Jebsen–Taylor Test (1 month after treatment) and pinch force
rTMS, low frequency Kakuda et al., 2011 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 204 adults, 58.4 years, 107 intracerebral hemorrhage, 27 cerebral cortical infarction, 70 lacunar infarction, 5.0±4.5 years Multi-center, longitudinal, no sham rTMS, sham- controlled 204 patients real TMS 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 20 min, 120-min intensive OT daily, 22 sessions during 15-day hospitali-zation Fugl–Meyer Assessment score and Wolf Motor Function Test log performance time decreased significantly at discharge. Changes seen persistently up to 4 weeks after discharge in 79 patients
rTMS, low frequency Avenanti et al., 2012 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 30 adults, 60.9 years, 29 subcortical, 1 cortical, average 31 months Double-blind, randomized, parallel, factorial design, longitudinal, sham- controlled, Phase II 30 patients, 8 real TMS+PT, 8 PT+real TMS, 7 sham TMS+PT, 7PT+sham TMS 1 Hz, 90% rMT, 25 min, 45 min physical training daily, 10 sessions Behavioral improvement (Jebsen– Taylor Hand Function Test, Nine- Hole Peg Test) and reduction of interhemispheric inhibition found after real rTMS, with the group receiving real TMS+PT showing robust and stable improvements, and the other group (PT+real TMS) showing a slight improvement decline over time
tDCS, cathodal Nair et al., 2011 Hand area of M1, unaffected hemisphere 14 adults, 58.5 years, 9 cortical and 5 subcortical, average 30.5 months Double-blind, randomized, longitudinal, sham- controlled 14 patients, 7 cathodal tDCS, 7 sham tDCS 60 min of OT and 30 min of tDCS (1 mA) each day for 5 days in a row Cathodal tDCS+OT results in more improvement in range-of-motion in multiple joints of paretic upper extremity and in upper extremity Fugl–Meyer score than sham tDCS+OT

fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; M1, primary motor cortex; MEP, motor evoked potential; OT, occupational therapy; PMC, premotor cortex; PT, physical training; rMT, resting motor threshold; RT, reaction time; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMA, supplementary motor area; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.