Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 23;7(7):8143–8154. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6994

Table 2. Cytoplasmic AQP1 expression in IDC patients.

Pathological features Cases AQP1 score, n (%) rs P
0 1–2 3–9
Age, y 0.082 0.139
< 50 146 41 (28.1) 56 (38.3) 49 (33.6)
≥ 50 178 35 (19.7) 75 (42.1) 68 (38.2)
Histological gradea 0.186 0.001
I 34 14 (41.2) 12 (35.3) 8 (23.5)
II 234 56 (23.9) 98 (41.9) 80 (34.2)
III 53 6 (11.3) 21 (39.6) 26 (49.1)
Tumor size, cm 0.130 0.020
≤ 2 90 30 (33.3) 37 (41.1) 23 (25.6)
2–5 214 40 (18.7) 86 (40.2) 88 (41.1)
> 5 20 6 (30.0) 8 (40.0) 6 (30.0)
Lymph node metastasis 0.129 0.020
Negative 145 38 (26.2) 66 (45.5) 41 (28.3)
Positive 179 38 (21.2) 65 (36.3) 76 (42.5)
pTNM 0.202 0.000
I 55 20 (36.4) 23 (41.8) 12 (21.8)
II 185 43 (23.2) 78 (42.2) 64 (34.6)
III–IV 84 13 (15.5) 30 (35.7) 41 (48.8)
Recurrence or distant metastasis 0.138 0.013
NO 270 66 (24.4) 116 (43.0) 88 (32.6)
Yes 54 10 (18.5) 15 (27.8) 29 (53.7)
ER statusa −0.120 0.031
Negative 92 14 (15.2) 39 (42.4) 39 (42.4)
Positive 231 62 (26.8) 92 (39.8) 77 (33.3)
PR statusa −0.159 0.004
Negative 68 11 (16.2) 22 (32.3) 35 (51.5)
Positive 255 65 (25.5) 109 (42.7) 81 (31.8)
Her2 statusa 0.075 0.178
– ∼ + 252 60 (23.8) 108 (42.9) 84 (33.3)
++ ∼ +++ 71 16 (22.5) 23 (32.4) 32 (45.1)
a

Some missing data