Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;7(7):8413–8421. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6761

Table 3. Prognostication comparison of built-up nomogram and original Leibovich model.

C-index (95%CI) AIC
Patients group No. of patients (%) Nomogram Leibovich Coefficient (95%CI) P Nomogram Leibovich
Overall 472 (100%) 0.854 (0.811 to 0.896) 0.836 (0.790 to 0.882) 0.037 (0.013 to 0.061) 0.010 706.0 738.2
TNM stage I+II 345 (73.1%) 0.819 (0.750 to 0.888) 0.768 (0.696 to 0.839) 0.051 (0.001 to 0.101) 0.044 404.8 410.0
UISS low or intermediate risk 438 (92.8%) 0.847 (0.790 to 0.903) 0.797 (0.738 to 0.856) 0.048 (0.015 to 0.082) 0.005 559.7 593.9
SSIGN low or intermediate risk 458 (97.0%) 0.848 (0.796 to 0.900) 0.801 (0.746 to 0.856) 0.049 (0.018 to 0.079) 0.002 608.5 645.0

Abbreviation: C-index, concordance index; AIC, Akaike's information criterion; UISS, UCLA Integrated Staging System; SSIGN, Mayo clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

C-index, 95%CI and AIC are calculated from 1000 bootstrap samples to protect from overfitting.