Skip to main content
. 2016 May 18;90(4):692–707. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.018

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Neurophysiological Recordings from Macaque ACCs, ACCg and OFC as Monkeys Performed a Modified Dictator Game

The recipients of the reward could be self, other monkey, or neither (Chang et al., 2013a).

(A) Left: recording sites on the medial wall, represented on a schematic of the different zones of the ACC. ACCg recordings were taken from a region that overlaps with both areas 24a/b and 32. Right: recording regions on a coronal plane of an MR image taken from Rushworth et al. (2004).

(B) Example neurons from the ACCs (top) and ACCg (bottom). Shown are spiking activity profiles after monkeys made a reward allocation decision (aligned to Choice, left) and after the outcome was actually received (aligned to Reward, right). The ACCs neuron responded to “other” and “neither” after a choice and at the time the reward was delivered. By contrast, the ACCg neuron responded only to other reward and not to self or neither both at the time of choice and the receipt of the reward.

(C) Proportion of neurons out of all neurons with a significant modulation to any decision or reward outcome that showed one of three potential reference frames. “Self- referenced” (red) neurons responded to rewarding outcomes referenced to self (whether self-received a reward or not) but did not distinguish between other or neither. These neurons could signal either received (predominantly in OFC) or foregone (predominantly in ACCs) reward for self. In blue are neurons that signaled reward for other only, and in purple are neurons that signaled reward for both self and other in a similar manner (but not to neither reward). The ACCg showed a significantly higher proportion of other-referenced and both-referenced neurons than either the ACCs or OFC, in which the majority of neurons were self-referenced.