Table 5.
Sampling sites | Soil type | Subordinate function value | Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQ | Chl | TR | GR | Average | |||
Liuyang | Polluted | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.60 | 2 |
Un-polluted | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 6 | |
Zhuzhou | Polluted | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1 |
Un-polluted | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 4 | |
Xiangtan | Polluted | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.33 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 3 |
Un-polluted | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 8 | |
Yueyang | Polluted | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.51 | 5 |
Un-polluted | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 7 | |
TQ, Chl, TR, and GR mean turf quality, chlorophyll content, transpiration rate, and growth rate, respectively. The subordinate function value of each index of each accession was evaluated by the following equation: X(μ) is the subordinate function value of the μth indicator, X is the observed value of an indicator, Xmax represents the maximum value of the indicator, and Xmin is the minimum value. X1 is the mean of fuzzy subordinate function value, and n is the number of indicators. If an index was negatively correlated with Cd tolerance, membership value of Cd resistance was estimated by anti-membership function (formula 2). Otherwise it was calculated by formula 1. Mean value was counted following the accumulation of all membership values of Cd tolerance (formula 3).