Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun;8(6):1356–1365. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.55

Table 1. Table of possible influencing factors on BLA visualization. During a pilot study we found the following parameters influencing the detection, number, size and shape of BLA (personal observation of Christoph Dietrich and his group).

Manufacturer
Imaging techniques, e.g., tissue harmonic imaging (THI)
Compound techniques
Transducer type (e.g., cardiac, convex, linear, microconvex probes)
Transducer shape
Transducer size (image size, width)
Transducer frequency, multi-frequency
Depth penetration (transmit zone from the transducer, from the pleura)
Focus level setting, single or multiple focuses (kind of focus, e.g., electronic)
Gain, depth gain compensation (DGC)
Dynamic range
Persistence
Tissue equalization technology
Frame rate
Line density
Smoothing parameters [depending on the equipment used, e.g., “edge” (sharper or smoother border), “delta” (to control the degree of contrast resolution within an image), space time (temporal resolution, spatial resolution)]
Other preprocessing parameters
Post processing parameters
Patient’s position, depth and circle of respiration
Area of examination
Focal changes of the pleura with or without pleural effusion
Examiner
Time of examination
Inter- and intra-observer variability
Pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease

BLA, B-line artifact.