Skip to main content
editorial
. 2016 Jun;8(6):1037–1041. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.90

Table 1. Specific CTO predictive scores.

Specific CTO score CTO lesions (n) Success (%) Variables Primary endpoint
N Clinical Angiographic CCTA
J-CTO score, Morino et al. (11) 494 88.6 5 Prior attempt (+1) Heavy calcification (+1)
Bending ≥45° (+1)
Blunt stump (+1)
Occlusion length >20 mm (+1)
GW crossing within 30 min
CT-RECTOR score, Opolski et al. (12) 240 65.0 6 Prior attempt (+1)
Occlusion duration
≥12 months or unknown (+1)
Multiple occlusion (+1)
Blunt stump (+1)
Calcification ≥50% CSA (+1)
Bending ≥45° (+1)
GW crossing within 30 min
CL score, Alessandrino et al. (13) 1,657 72.5 6 Previous CABG (+1.5)
Previous MI (+1)
Severe calcification (+2)
CTO length >20 mm (+1.5)
Non-LAD CTO (+1)
Blunt stump (+1)
Successful antegrade first attempt
PROGRESS-CTO score, Christopoulos et al. (14) 781 92.9 4 Proximal cap ambiguity (+1)
Moderate/severe tortuosity (+1)
LCx CTO (+1)
Absence of “interventional” collaterals (+1)
Successful hybrid approach
ORA score, Galassi et al. (15) 1,073 91.9 3 Age ≥75 years (+1) Ostial location (+1)
Collateral filling < Rentrop2 (+2)
Technical failure by both antegrade and/or retrograde techniques
Liu et al. (16) 728 N/A 3 Age ≥75 years (+1)
LVEF <40% (+1)
Baseline Scr >1.5 mg/dL (+2)
Contrast induced nephropathy

CTO, chronic total occlusions; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; GW, guidewire; CSA, cross sectional area; MI, myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; N/A, not available; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SCr, serum creatinine.