Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun;8(6):1257–1268. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.68

Table 2. Evidence quality for each outcome.

Asthma outcomes Quality assessment Effect Quality Importance
Mean follow-up duration (months) No. of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Relative risk (95% CI) Strong association
Asthma exacerbation 86.4 6 Observational No serious No serious No serious No serious 1.06 (1.04–1.09) No Moderate Critical1
Hospitalization because of asthma 43.6 4 Observational No serious No serious No serious No serious 1.22 (1.12–1.34) No Moderate Important
Unscheduled doctor visit because of asthma 12 1 Observational No serious No serious No serious Serious2 4.26 (2.52–7.19) Yes3 Low Important
ED visit because of asthma 23.6 5 Observational No serious No serious No serious No serious 1.06 (1.01–1.10) No Moderate Important
SCS use for asthma 15 1 Observational No serious No serious No serious Serious4 1.20 (0.93–1.56) No Low Important

CI, confidence interval; ED, emergency department; SCS, systemic corticosteroid. 1, exacerbations are the most important outcome for patients with asthma (3); 2, sample size =287; 3, the relative risk for an unscheduled visit for asthma was 4.257; 4, the Optimal Information Size criterion was met, the 95% CI overlapped with no effect, and the CI failed to exclude important harm.