Skip to main content
. 2016 May 31;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2389-8

Table 1.

Summary of current clinical trial PFS data on which statistical calculations are based

KRAS unknown KRAS WT KRAS mutant KRAS G13D
BOND study [1] cetuximab alone vs cetuximab + irinotecan 6 m PFS = 8 % vs. 30 % NA NA NA
CO.17 [4] cetuximab vs best supportive care N/A 6 m PFS cetuximab = 30 % 6 m PFS < 5 %
De Roock [11] cetuximab vs no cetuximab N/A Median PFS 4.2 m vs 1.9 m Median PFS 1.9 m vs 1.8 m Median PFS 4.0 m vs 1.7 m
Tepjar [12] cetuximab vs no cetuximab as 1st line treatment Not relevant Median PFS 9.6 m vs 7.6 m Median PFS 6.7 m vs 8.1 m Median PFS 7.4 m vs 6.0 m