Table 1.

Setting, Design, Sample Size and Results of the Experiments in the Small-Scale Meta Analyses

Experiment	Setting	Design	Total n	M testing mediator (SD)	M restudy mediator (SD)	M testing related (SD)	M restudy related (SD)
Coppens et al. Exp1 No-Mc	Online	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	87	0.26 (0.26)	0.13 (0.24)	0.21 (0.21)	0.16 (0.17)
Coppens et al. Exp1 Strong Mc	Online	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	94	0.50 (0.46)	0.40 (0.38)	0.38 (0.23)	0.14 (0.13)
Coppens et al. Exp2	Online	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	141	0.36 (0.31)	0.24 (0.25)	0.50 (0.27)	0.37 (0.26)
Coppens et al. Exp3	Online	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	95	0.57 (0.33)	0.29 (0.27)	0.31 (0.21)	0.32 (0.24)
Carpenter 2011 Exp2	Lab	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	40	0.58 (0.23)	0.23 (0.12)	0.29 (0.18)	0.18 (0.16)
Rawson et al. Appendix B long lag	Lab	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects	65	0.28 (0.25)	0.15 (0.19)	0.18 (0.17)	0.11 (0.15)
Rawson et al. Appendix B short lag	Lab	2 retrieval cue (mediator vs. related) × 2 learning (restudy vs. testing) mixed with retrieval cue within subjects	63	0.28 (0.26)	0.12 (0.18)	0.15 (0.18)	0.09 (0.12)
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set A	Lab	Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) manipulated between subjects	68	0.27 (0.20)	0.19 (0.16)
Brennan, Cho & Neely Set B	Lab	Mediator cue only, learning (restudy vs. testing) between subjects	68	0.14 (0.12)	0.06 (0.08)