Skip to main content
. 2016 May 29;10(Suppl 1):9–13. doi: 10.4137/DTI.S39077

Table 2.

Comparison of various studies that have investigated GICS use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.

AUTHOR TYPE OF STUDY SUBGROUP OUTCOME GICS NO GICS P-VALUE
Bennett-Guerrero et al31 Multicenter RCT, 1502 pts All pts Any SWI (ITT) 8.4% 8.7% 0.83
Any SWI (PP) 8.4% 8.6% 0.89
BMI > 30 Any SWI 8.1% 4.2% 0.07
Diabetes Any SWI 4% 5.4% 0.52
BMI > 30 + diabetes Any SWI 11.1% 13.8% 0.30
Friberg et al16 Two-centers RCT, 2000 pts All pts Any SWI 4.3% 9% <0.001
SSWI 1.9% 5.7% <0.001
DSWI 2.3% 3.3% 0.20
No reoperation or early death SSWI 2.7% 6.7% <0.001
DSWI 2.1% 3.3% 0.088
Diabetes SSWI 1.67% 7.47% 0.0086
DSWI 3.89% 9.77% 0.028
BMI > 25 SSWI 2.16% 6.45% <0.001
DSWI 2.47% 4.45% 0.050
Birgand et al35 Single center CS, 552 pts BIMA + BMI > 30 or ID diabetes DSWI 12.6% 13.8% NS

Abbreviations: BIMA, bilateral internal mammary; CS, cohort study; DSWI, deep sternal wound infection; BMI, body mass index; GICS, gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponge; ID, insulin-dependent; ITT, intention-to-treat; NS, not significant; PP, per-protocol; pts, patients; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SSWI, superficial sternal wound infection; SWI, sternal wound infection.