Table 3.
Coefficient β | 95% CI | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Total BICS-Q Score | |||
Black | 3.2 | −0.7, 7.0 | 0.12 |
Latina | 7.4 | 2.2, 12.7 | <0.01 |
Inconvenience Subscale | |||
Black | 1.2 | −0.3, 2.6 | 0.12 |
Latina | 2.4 | 0.4, 4.4 | 0.02 |
Relationship Subscale | |||
Black | 1.0 | −0.1, 2.2 | 0.08 |
Latina | 0.2 | −1.3, 1.8 | 0.76 |
Cost Subscale | |||
Black | 0.4 | −0.7, 1.5 | 0.42 |
Latina | 1.7 | 0.2, 3.2 | 0.03 |
Site-Related Subscale | |||
Black | 0.5 | −0.4, 1.4 | 0.29 |
Latina | 1.6 | 0.4, 2.8 | 0.01 |
Fear Subscale | |||
Black | 0.05 | −0.9, 1.0 | 0.92 |
Latina | 1.5 | 0.2, 2.8 | 0.03 |
Data were calculated using linear regression models with the following covariates: education, income, age, ISI, and I-QOL. White women were considered the reference group for all analyses.